Gun control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Gun cover - Research Paper ExampleHowever, in my opinion, I support that we need strict triggerman run across laws in each country. In my country-China only policemen and military shtup absorb shooters. The citizens cant let guns. Due to the strict gun support laws, Chinas murder rate was nearly the last(a) in the world, well below countries such as Japan and Switzerland. Chinas homicide rate stands at 0.8 cases per 100,000 people, Japans rate is 14. Therefore, strict gun ascendancy laws are needed in dedicate to decreasing the murder rate. There are few ways we can strict gun control laws in the follow. One does not need to look very hard to find evidence that gun control is needed within the current era. The rash of mash shootings, to include the Colorado Theater shooting, sandlike Hook, as well as a great litany of others, underscores the fact that guns legally obtained through the proper take are oftentimes utilized to commit these brazen acts of terror. As such, the issue that this comes down to is what the government can seek to do with regards to limiting the supply of guns while at the same time seeking to bring through the civil rights of individuals within fiat. Accordingly, the following arguments lead present a case for why gun control and stricter gun laws are required while at the same time presenting the case for why stricter gun laws entrust not necessarily improve the situation that has been thus far evidenced throughout society relating to gun crimes and/or mass shootings. Firstly, there is he stance that further gun control would benefactor to mimic the actions that have been taken in other nations around the globe. One does not have to pass too deeply into the statistics to realize that developed economies and societies, such as Germany, France, Italy, and Great Britain, do not carry out anywhere near the same levels of gun crime as does the United States (OBrien et al. 7). This is of course due to a number of reasons. Th e first of these has to do with the fact that the right to bear arms is not unique to the European nations that have thus far been listed. However, this inherent right is built into the United States Constitution with regards to the Second Amendment. This fact amendment guarantees that Congress will not impede the right of the citizen to own and bear arms. However, even a perfunctory analysis reveals the fact that laws such as a minimum age for purchasing firearms and/or the necessity to obtain a legal permit in order to conceal a weapon have already infringed upon this Second Amendment right. In this way, those who continually assert that the Second Amendment is hallowed ground that the government will never be able to infringe upon are sorely mistaken as it has already been infringed upon, defined, and weasel-worded by a great many different laws. An argument against further gun control in order to present the atrocities that have thus far been listed has to do with the fact th at criminals are, by their very nature, munificent with the impacts or repercussions of breaking the law. In this manner, seeking to engage further gun laws as a fashion of reducing the supply of guns available to these individual via legal channels will not necessarily solve the situation. Instead, it is reasonable to assume that if an individual intends on breaking the law in the first place, then they will equally be willing to purchase a firearm or ammunition on the discolour market outside of the channels of supply that the United