Free Essays on The Nature Of Appearance’s Relationship With Reality In Modern English Satire

England, England, a sardonic novel by Julian Barnes, explores the dichotomy of man’s satisfaction with reproductions of authentic experiences. The story draws from the twisted ideas of the enigmatic Sir Jack Pitman, a well-known London entrepreneur who wishes to build a theme park on the Isle of Wight based on stereotypes and clichà ©s associated with England. His company purchases the island and creates an independent country where participants can visit and even live in a manufactured culture and history based on common preconceptions. Pitman rules the new nation as virtual dictator and hires actors posing as English people to inhabit the park. The protagonist Martha Cochrane, who suffers under Pitman’s yoke of influence as a â€Å"Special Consultant† (Barnes 45), eventually intervenes and takes control of â€Å"England, England† when she feels Jack has overstepped his authority. The author’s underlying philosophy is that humans prefer an ide alistic representation of the truth to the truth itself. Barnes employs two- sided characters and a counterfeit England to develop his theme that the world is an illusion. The private behaviors of Sir Jack Pitman’s character vastly deviate from the commanding personality he projects to his employees. To the public eye, the president of PitCo comes across as a ruthless, strict, and matter-of-fact businessman. Barnes characterizes him as having a bored and condescending tone with his coworkers. Indeed, when his subordinate Mark asks him how he intends to go about solving the problem of birthing a small sovereign nation from scratch, the stern Pitman only responds, â€Å"you do it by doing it† (128). A man with an obvious sense of innate encouragement, Pitman believes that the two means of achieving a goal are his way or the highway. One of his traits, however, stands out from the rest. An interesting quirk in the man’s character concerns his affection and loyal, scheduled sessions... Free Essays on The Nature Of Appearance’s Relationship With Reality In Modern English Satire Free Essays on The Nature Of Appearance’s Relationship With Reality In Modern English Satire England, England, a sardonic novel by Julian Barnes, explores the dichotomy of man’s satisfaction with reproductions of authentic experiences. The story draws from the twisted ideas of the enigmatic Sir Jack Pitman, a well-known London entrepreneur who wishes to build a theme park on the Isle of Wight based on stereotypes and clichà ©s associated with England. His company purchases the island and creates an independent country where participants can visit and even live in a manufactured culture and history based on common preconceptions. Pitman rules the new nation as virtual dictator and hires actors posing as English people to inhabit the park. The protagonist Martha Cochrane, who suffers under Pitman’s yoke of influence as a â€Å"Special Consultant† (Barnes 45), eventually intervenes and takes control of â€Å"England, England† when she feels Jack has overstepped his authority. The author’s underlying philosophy is that humans prefer an ide alistic representation of the truth to the truth itself. Barnes employs two- sided characters and a counterfeit England to develop his theme that the world is an illusion. The private behaviors of Sir Jack Pitman’s character vastly deviate from the commanding personality he projects to his employees. To the public eye, the president of PitCo comes across as a ruthless, strict, and matter-of-fact businessman. Barnes characterizes him as having a bored and condescending tone with his coworkers. Indeed, when his subordinate Mark asks him how he intends to go about solving the problem of birthing a small sovereign nation from scratch, the stern Pitman only responds, â€Å"you do it by doing it† (128). A man with an obvious sense of innate encouragement, Pitman believes that the two means of achieving a goal are his way or the highway. One of his traits, however, stands out from the rest. An interesting quirk in the man’s character concerns his affection and loyal, scheduled sessions...

Analysis of LinkedIn Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Analysis of LinkedIn - Research Paper Example Current ratio- The firm’s current ratio is increasing and getting stronger as the year progresses. A ratio of above one indicates the firm can settle its short-term obligation within a financial year and still conduct its operation effectively. This is proven by the networking capital across the year which increases across the year. In the year 2012, the ratio was 2.45 it rose to 4.7 in the year 2014. Return on Assets- The value of assets owned by LinkedIn Corporation is increasing across the financial years that have been analyzed above. However, the return on this asset is decreasing. This simply means that the assets the firm have invested on are not been utilized to the maximum or the resources are in surplus. In the year 2014, the return was in the negative figure because the firm had incurred losses. The revenue generated across the three years was increasing as well as the costs for revenue generation. However, the rate at which the cost of revenue was increasing was hi gher than that of revenue being generated. This has to be taken into account because if this continues LinkedIn profits will be â€Å"eaten-up†. Equity ratio- This ratio indicates a firm dependence on debt to run its operations. From the above analysis, the equity ratio for LinkedIn is good because over 60% of the firm’s asset was financed by its shareholders. However, in the year 2014, the equity ratio dropped to 61.3% from 78.4 % in 2013. According to (Samuels, and Wilkes, 72), it indicates the firm had increased its borrowing.

Basic characteristics, management and performance of Apple 02245 Essay

Basic characteristics, management and performance of Apple 02245 - Essay Example The profitability, market share, degree of competition and the growth strategy of the company will be thoroughly evaluated in this paper. The management approach and the performance of the company in the recent times are also analyzed. Apple Inc. has a unique corporate culture. It does not govern through many layers of management. The top management directly communicates with its employees. It tries to attract the employees by offering both, facilities and challenges. The enterprise is committed in maintaining an innovative and collaborative environment. It also trains its retail employees so that they can make their customers feel comfortable and also provides them scope for moving upward to the level of a manager. Thus, the enterprise attracts retail employees (Sawayda, 2011). Apple’s transition into a consumer electronics manufacture from a computer manufacturer was unpredictable and was successful due to the remarkable leadership skills of Steve Jobs, the company’s highly skilled employees and its determined corporate culture. (A description of the organization’s basic characteristics) The production function of a firm expresses the functional relationship between the quantities of outputs and inputs. It shows that to what extent the output changes with variations in input within a specified time period. The equal products curves or isoquants shows all those input combinations which are capable of producing the same output (Moschandreas, 2000). The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) is the rate at which the inputs can be substituted for each other in order to maintain the same level of output. It can be expressed as the ratio of the marginal products of two factors (Moschandreas, 2000). In the short run, at least one input of the firm must be fixed while in the long run, all the inputs of the firm are variable. The total cost function of a firm comprises of the total variable costs and the total fixed

Ethical Dilemma Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethical Dilemma - Essay Example When the managers investigated the issue, they came to know that the software developer was not able to fulfill the requirements of the customer due to which he was delaying the issue. He tried to hide from the managers his poor skills in removing software errors. Later on, the company provided the customer with his desired software in just two days using another developer. The ethical issue in this example was that the developer tried to hide his inability in removing the errors by trying to delay the issue. The issue not only decreased the customer’s confidence in the company but also resulted in putting a spot on the company’s image. The developer could have tackled the situation in a much different way. He should have made the company aware of the real situation instead of being afraid of losing his job.  I believe that if an employee of a company behaves unethically, it puts an adverse impact on the overall image of the company. It not only results in the loss of customers’ confidence in the company’s products but also affects the image of the company. Therefore, employees should behave ethically in all situations because ethical behavior is the key to the resolution of complex issues.If I would be in the position of the software developer, I would handle the issue differently. I would not hide my disabilities on the cost of losing the customer’s confidence. First, I would collect detailed information to resolve the issue properly. I would come to the customer personally to know the concerns of the customer. 2 Next, I would determine the exact issue by analyzing the information obtained from the customer. I would consider the nature of my job responsibilities and my obligations to the company while determining the issue and my role in resolving the issue. Brown (2011) states, â€Å"Ethical issues that arise in the workplace should be carefully examined, and handled with care, as the determinations of these ethical issu es can lead to the growth or demise of a company†. 3 After determining the key ethical issue, I would identify the individuals who would be involved in the issue. In the above-mentioned case, I would carefully analyze the situation to identify the stakeholders and

Dickens’ Victorian Critique of Church and State Essay Example for Free

Dickens’ Victorian Critique of Church and State Essay There is not much question in a look at his career’s work, that Charles Dickens was by his nature a harsh social critic. He would often make his characters morally objectionable in order to demonstrate the ills of society and would take an especially great interest in showing the iniquities of Church and State. In the deeply unequal England of the Victorian era, Dickens felt that he saw a lot of suffering, a great many people in need and a visible disgust of the rich toward the poor. The fact that these conditions had associated so closely with the premise of God and Crown had drawn out in critics such as Dickens as sharp distaste for the British institution girding both. That is why so many of his works centered on the relationship of the rich and poor, separated as such by the unwelcome permeation of authority of the former over the latter. The labor conditions Dickens explores in Hard Times through such figures as Stephen are contrasted sharply by the life of decadence and sanctimony denoting the figure of Josiah Bounderby. Clearly the figure through who Dickens channels the greatest pitch of protest, there is a clear hostility toward the hypocrisy and meanness which allows Bounderby to prevail over the poor of Coketown with a divinely entitled and self-declared superiority. It is here that Dickens captures the Victorian era’s undercurrent of resentment of the exploitation of God and Church for the interests of rendering selective such universal entitlements as faith and justice. In Bounderby, we are given the opportunity to view the justice system in Dickens’ time as something principally founded on inequality, determining a process which is governed by an aristocratic jurisdiction over that which deemed righteous, just and moral. All of these concepts emerge in Bounderby, and especially in a notable encounter with Stephen, suggest the most demonstrably inappropriate misuse of religious principles. In Hard Times, published in 1854, Dickens shows that he is specifically interested in dealing with a current problem of labor abuse. He draws a deeply negative picture of the rationalist political movement with which Bounderby may be identified. This was a powerful movement at the time in England. Rationality was focused on facts, which Dickens believed were used to give strict control over education, values and even creativity. This would impact the making of religion and justice too. The chief characterization of Bounderby captures this points exceedingly well, remarking that â€Å"there was a moral infection of claptrap in him. Strangers, modest enough elsewhere, started up at dinners in Coketown, and boasted in quite a rampant way, of Bounderby. They made him out to be the Royal arms, the Union-Jack, Magna Charta, John Bull, Habeas Corpus, the Bill of Rights, an Englishman’s house is his castle, Church and State, and God Save the Queen, all put together. † (52) The declaration, clearly satirical in its delivery, is nonetheless a premise upon which we will find Bounderby behaving in the most repugnant of ways. When the aforementioned Stephen, an honest laborer detained in a marriage with an abusive and alcoholic wife, goes to Bounderby, the wealthy mill owner and a public judge, he is denied a request for divorce. Bounderby denies him because poor laborers like him are not expected to have the money to have a divorce. In the scene between Stephen and Bounderby, we can see how the justice system is deeply imbalanced, as are the attitudes of the people in the justice system. When Stephen argues that the legal system wouldn’t let him get a divorce was a ‘muddle,’ Bounderby disciplines him, â€Å"Don’t you talk nonsense, my good fellow,. . . about things you don’t understand; and don’t you call the Institutions of your country a muddle , or you’ll get yourself into a real muddle one of these find mornings. The institutional of your country are not your piece-work, and the only thing you have got to do, is, to mind your piece-work. You didn’t take your wife for fast and for loose; but for better for worse. If she has turned out worse—why, all we have got to say is, she might have turned out better† (Hard Times, 84) The response, which only makes Stephen more angry, shows how Dickens’ really likes to use the writing device of irony. As Bounderby and Mrs. Sparsit, who is a rich, high-class woman with a divorce, together call Stephen guilty of ‘impiety,’ we know that the two are having some sort of inappropriate relationship with one another. This casts a blaring spotlight on the hypocrisy at the root of his cruel religiosity. Bounderby takes on the mantle of Dickens’ twinned reproach for the system and church which had conspired to make England so deeply unequal a place. That God had come to overwhelm the senses of justice and humanism seems a clear justification to Dickens that the core morality of religion had by the Victorian age been exposed for the bastard-child of human conceit which it had come to embody. Indeed, in the above claim by Bounderby against Stephen, was can see that Dickens is be very sarcastic when he uses the word ‘impiety. ’ Particularly, the statement is delivered at the expense of a poor man, demonstrating a perceived relationship between righteousness and social class. The cruel and empowered judge would characterize himself as the man of God, so noted for his chosen rank and certainly not, from the reader’s (or Dickens’) perspective, because of his admirable moral disposition.. The outcome of Stephen’s visit to Bounderby and Sparsit is that his poor, labor-class status renders him morally, and thus legally, forbidden from divorce. A clear symptom of the Victorian era, we can see Dickens taking particular pains demonstrate that manner in which religion and justice had come to falsely associate. The vitriol which Bounderby aims at Stephen is powerfully representative of the purpose in this association, allowing the wealthy to prevail over fundamental personal institutions such as the faith, family and welfare of the poor. Works Cited Dickens, C. (1870). Hard Times. Barnes Noble Classics.

EHR Implementation and Effects on Nursing Essay -- medical records, he

EHR Implementation Background The implementation of electronic health records (EHR) continues to make an impact on nursing and patient care throughout the country. As a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, all public and private healthcare providers were required to implement electronic health records in their facilities by January 1, 2014. By demonstrating â€Å"meaningful use† of the electronic medical record, facilities are able to maintain Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement levels. Providers who show that they are meeting the â€Å"meaningful use† criteria during EHR use will receive an incentive payment from Medicare and Medicaid. â€Å"Meaningful use† is â€Å"using certified technology in EHR implementation to improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities; engage patients and families; improve care coordination; and maintain privacy and security of patient health information† (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2013). The federal government has encouraged EHR use in hopes that it will significantly improve patient care. There is the intent that electronic health records will allow any provider access to important patient health information no matter where the patient is, while â€Å"creating a comprehensive national electronic health information network that leads to a reduction in the duplication of tests, an improvement in the cost-effectiveness of interventions, and the ability to compile a comprehensive patient history† (McBride, Delaney, Tietze, 2012). While the implementation of EHR’s has good intent, an important question is, â€Å"How are the implementation of EHRs having an effect on emergency nursing and patient care?† Benefits of EHR Use in the Emergency Department Nurses are... ...ers to consider long-term benefits. (2012). ED Management, 24(3). Guterl, G. (2012, April 2). Motivating Meaningful Use on ADVANCE for Nurses. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://nursing.advanceweb.com/Features/Articles/Motivating-Meaningful-Use.aspx Kutney-Lee, A. (2011). The effect of hospital electronic health record on. NCBI, 41(11). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236066/ McBride, S., Delaney, J., & Tietze, M. (2012). Health Information Technology and Nursing. American Journal of Nursing, 112(8). Retrieved from http://www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/pdf?AID=1402619&an=00152258-201301000-00010&Journal_ID=&Issue_ID= Meaningful Use - Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2013, December 6). Retrieved February 19, 2015, from http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Meaningful_Use.html

Influence Change through Strategic Thinking Essay

Strategic Thinking can be defined as the learning process which entails many aspects of turning the innovative ideas into reality through team work, planning and organizing of resources. It includes the need to have problem solving abilities and critical analysis of situations. Strategic thinking can be used as a very effective tool to implement; manage and sustain the change in any organization and help organizations prosper under the scheme of change (Sanders, 1998). Why is Strategic thinking necessary? Strategic thinking when compared with strategic planning serves us with many differences. With an aerial view, both of ideas seem to be very similar, however, in actual organizational based scenarios, strategic thinking is quiet different from planning, and involves more rigorous activities. Strategic thinking only helps in shaping the future that is partial planning of the future. In the process, the ideas are not discreet and are interactive in nature. This helps to generate better outputs as the interaction gives other the chances to present their opinions. Strategic thinking provides lower level management to have their say in strategy making and development as it an interactive system of thinking. The involvement of the management at all levels is what gives it an edge over strategic planning. An organization is a system in which sub systems are present. These sub systems interact with each others and hence managers at all the levels come together to create a strategy viable for their organization. All the managers understand their positions and their roles in the organization know that they are correlated and are interdependent (Wootton & Horne, 2002). Strategic thinking has one important aspect i. e. , change. Change is inevitable when strategic thinking is in process. It is true that strategic thinking tackles the difficult part of implementing the change rather than sustaining and evaluating it. Change management is difficult and the toughest part of change management is implementing and managing change (Wootton & Horne, 2002). Strategic Thinking and Influencing Change However, strategic thinking assists in successful change implementation. Change management and transformation from one state to the other is involved with rigorous planning and with out planning, change management process would come out to be a failure. Hence, strategic thinks aids in making correct decisions as it an interactive system of thinking (Kotter, 1996). The important thing is to identify whether the change is at strategic, operational or functional level, and when change is identify, it must be made sure that in order to bring about the change a paradigm shift must come. The change that would come would bring a transformation current system and the way things are done in an organization. Innovative thinking and thinking that is out of the box clearly assists in planning and implementing a strategic change in an organization. Continuous improvements and evaluation is another critical success factor in implementing change with the aid of critical thinking. In order to bring about the change effectively, the mangers must challenge the current situation they are in. complacency should be avoided at all levels of change. All assumption must be confronted and must be checked against the current scenarios if they are applicable. All the assumptions must be checked against the evidences and must be characterized and prioritized (Kotter, 1996). The managers must make a clear distinction between their ends and the means they would achieve those ends. The ends must be clearly identified and the means and methods of achieving those ends must be done when ends are assessed and are understood. Change brings about resistance, and at this stage, managers must identify the means to handle the resistance and the consequences of the resistance (Kotter, 1996). All levels of the planning process must be utilized in strategic thinking when establishing change in any organization or at stage of organizational life. These levels are mega level, macro level and micro level. At all levels of organizational change and planning process a holistic approach should be employed and used. This would help the managers understand what change would consequently which part of the system and sub system. Interaction amongst those systems would clear away the hurdles that could come in the process of change, and better ideas come up to eradicate and overcome those barriers. Relationships should be established in strategic thinking to understand that the organization is not a stand alone entity but is well connected with the outside world (Sanders, 1998). Measurable objectives must be set so that they are evaluated at a later stage of change and when the change is needed to be sustained, the specific changes can be managed well if there is a slight disorder in them. Indistinguishable and ambiguous objectives should not be adhered to and should not be taken into account. Status quo must not be challenged but a change should be with in the status quo and achievable at all levels of the organization. The pros and cons must be measured. If the success of that particular change is made measurable then the failure and damages of that particular change should also be made measurable (Kotter, 1996). Ideal vision, even though difficult to achieve, always provides the possibilities that can be present to lead to that particular ideal vision. This is the basis of strategic thinking. Continuous improvement and incessant change is the key to organization’s success. Both amalgamated give a perfect strategy to come about a successful change action with minimized resistance and better results (Sanders, 1998).